Risk analysis of collision accidents during underway STS berthing maneuver through integrating fault tree analysis (FTA) into Bayesian network (BN)

by Capt. Mustafa Sökükcü and Cenk Sakar - published on 3 May 2023 172 -


Ship to ship tanker maneuvering operation, which take place while both ships are underway and in open sea circumstances, present a number of unique challenges in terms of collision that differ from conventional port berthing maneuvers. Given the flammable quality of the commodities transported and the limited access to emergency response vehicles owing to the operation's distance from the land, risk analysis of these berthing maneuvers is critical. Therefore, the fundamental purpose of this research is to conduct a probabilistic risk analysis of collision incidents by integrating fault tree analysis with bayesian network analysis using a fuzzy method. Initially, the fault tree analysis (FTA) was utilized to determine critical events and their logical structure. Expert opinion and fuzzy theory is used to deal effectively with uncertainty in probabilities of basic events. Considering the constraints of FTA in terms of conditional dependencies and static nature, a Bayesian network mapping from FTA is developed to overcome this limitation. BN is utilized to simulate the risk associated with the entire operating process by probability updating and sensitivity analysis. The results indicated that the “mooring line breakdown”, “main engine failure” and “steering system failure” root nodes are the most contributing factors to the STS collision accidents. The findings show that this research technique is realistic and reasonable, and makes an important contribution to the literature by combining FTA-BN as a dynamic risk assessment methodology to the improvement of STS operation.


All cargo transfer operations between two vessels either by both vessels underway or one of the vessels anchored or moored to a buoy or a jetty, are considered ship to ship (STS) transfer operations at sea (ICS, O., CDI, S., 2013; Stavrou and Ventikos, 2016). Due to the limited number of deep-water ports and the increase in the number of deep-draft vessels (Zhuang and Su, 2015), there is an increase in the number of STS operations all of the time. Since the ships do not need to dock at the port, STS operations result in significant time savings as well as financial gains for the companies (Decker, 2006).

The main publication currently considered as the most important guideline on STS tanker transfer operations is the book "Ship to Ship Transfer Guide for Petroleum, Chemicals and Liquefied Gases" published by industry leaders Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF), Chemical Distribution Institute (CDI), International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) and Society of International Gas Tanker and Terminal Operators (SIGTTO). This book, which was first published in 1975, has been updated in the following years and has been used as the main source in previous studies published on STS tanker transfer operations with its last published version in 2013 (ICS, O., CDI, S., 2013). Despite a surge in published studies over the last few years, little emphasis has been dedicated to risk assessment of STS transfer operations.

Numerous studies in the simulator environment have been conducted to ascertain the hydrodynamic interactions between vessels during STS operations (Skejic and Faltinsen, 2007; Pedersen et al., 2008; Souza and Morishita, 2011; Lataire et al., 2011; Witkowska et al., 2017) and safety of the STS cargo transfer operations (Berg, 2007; Zhuang and Su, 2015; Stavrou and Ventikos, 2016; Husjord, 2016; Abramowicz-Gerigk et al., 2018; Sultana et al., 2019). Shimizu et al. (2010) analysed the black box (VDR) data of an aframax tanker, which was involved in ship-to-ship transfer operations in the United States between 2007-2009 and a guide and decision support system was tried to be created in order to increase operational safety. It was concluded that the relative distance between the ships is the most critical factor in STS approach maneuvers. Xiang et al. (2011) used three-dimensional potential flow theory to examine the hydrodynamic interactions between an aframax and a VLCC tanker during the STS transfer procedure. As a result of the experiments, it was concluded that the hydrodynamic interactions between the ships during the STS approach maneuvers should be carefully examined in order to prevent collision accidents. Arici et al. (2020) performed quantitative risk analysis of STS cargo transfer operations by consulting expert opinions together with Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) and Event Tree Analysis (ETA). Not to follow manoeuvring plan, not to take necessary action for interaction effect and lack of appropriate monitoring close quarter situation were determined as the most probable factors.

Statistics on the OSIS database reveal that a total of 3371 STS incidents have been reported in the last 36 months (OnlineSTS, 2021). The most common incident during STS operations is the collision accident, which occurs when the vessels approach each other for berthing (Witkowska et al., 2017; Abramowicz-Gerigk et al., 2018). To mitigate the likelihood of these occurrences, risk management must be carried out at an acceptable level due to the fact that risk assessments are critical for improving the protection of operations.

Different risk assessment methodologies have been developed and are now being utilized in the marine industry to carry out risk assessments (Khakzad et al., 2011). The FTA can provide an efficient method for revealing the causes of fault and dealing with the relationships between events. However, unlike Bayesian Network (BN), the FTA model is static and cannot be used to analyze dynamic systems. In order to overcome these drawbacks, FTA and BN are used together in the analysis of dynamic systems (Yanfu and Min, 2012; Kabir et al., 2019). As opposed to other risk evaluation methods, BNs are useful directed acyclic graph for making decisions in an uncertain environment since they are easy to understand. The likelihood of events may be updated using with new observations (Khakzad et al., 2011; Atoui et al, 2016). On the other hand, the amount of failure data available for risk analysis is frequently insufficient. Consulting expert opinions have emerged as a viable method for determining failure probability in the face of data uncertainty. To cope with uncertainties in unintentionally collected data, fuzzy sets and evidence theory were formulated to handle risk analysis uncertainties (Huang et al., 2001; Ferdous et al., 2013). It is a method widely used in network structures to seek expert opinions while determining failure probabilities of root causes due to insufficient literature, low reliability or bias (Druzdzel and Van de Gaag, 2013; Li et al., 2018).

This dynamic risk analysis model by integrating FTA and BN is commonly used in the maritime sector for risk assessments of incidents and other occurrences. Atehnjia et al. (2018) examine the detailed risk analysis for a specific shipyard dry dock gate by using FT-BN. Ren et al. (2020) suggested a fault diagnosis approach for lubrication systems of a diesel engine by integrating FT and BN. Yang and Sørensen (2020) developed FT-BN to assess the marine power transmission subsystem. Chen et al. (2015) used BN to FTA to conduct a risk assessment of maritime incidents in Shenzhen Waters. Li et al. (2018) presented a dynamic risk evaluation framework for third party damage on submarine pipelines by using FTA-BN. Jia et al. (2018) mapped an FTA to a BN in order to ascertain the collision's underlying reasons. To identify essential risk variables for ship fires, Wang et al. (2020) analysed the data using an FTA-BN technique. Sakar et al. (2021) applied BN to FTA to assess risk of grounding marine accidents. When fault tree analysis is used alone, it is insufficient in the analysis of dynamic systems, and although Bayesian networks have advantages in dealing with uncertain situations, scientific and rational modelling in practical applications includes some difficulties. In order to solve this problem, in this research Bayesian network integrated with fault tree analysis.

The purpose of this work is to develop a combined risk analysis model by using FTA and BN methods together in order to be able to dynamic risk analysis of collision accidents during underway STS berthing manoeuvres. By defining the relationships between events, FTA is used to create a graphical model of BN, and BN is used to model risk across the entire STS process. Basically, this study can give substantial assistance in making better decision by ship operators, masters and third parties related to STS operations.

The following sections of the study are laid out as follows: The material and methods Section 2 explain the fault tree analysis, bayesian networks, and integration of fault tree into bayesian network and fuzzy set theory briefly. Section 3 presents the proposed risk analysis methodology framework. Addressing basic event, fault tree modelling and nodes (basic event)’ probabilities estimation are provided in Section 4. Mapping from FT to BN, BN analysis with probability updating and sensitivity analysis, model validation and case study are shown in Section 5. In the conclusion section, presents the primary findings and their interpretation.

What's your opinion on this?
Login or register to write comments and join the discussion!

Article Study: "An evaluation of fatigue factors in maritime pilot work scheduling"

by - published on 17 September 2020

Already published for the first time in September 2020: Maritime piloting operations involve on-call work schedules that may lead to sleep loss and circadian misalignment. The study documented pilot work scheduling practices.


Video Port of Fremantle

published on 14 October 2019

Case Study: A study conducted for Fremantle Ports on vessel interacting within the harbour.


Article Psychophysical stress and strain of maritime pilots in Germany. A cross-sectional study

published on 12 June 2021

Maritime pilots work in an irregular deployment system (rotation system) with unpredictable work assignments under high levels of physical and mental stress. Fatigue or chronic diseases, e.g. coronary heart disease, peptic ulcers or gastritis can occur as a consequence.


Article 1,000 ways to secure a Pilot Ladder

by Arie Palmers, Netherlands - published on 10 January 2020

From that moment on I have been keeping a tally of the non compliant boarding arrangements I see in front of me on a daily base, and off course I participate in the annual safety campaign, conducted by IMPA each october.


Article Board of commissioners of Pilots of the State of New York

published on 22 December 2021

At the 27 October 2020 meeting, the Board reviewed the SHPA grant request for a pilot ladder climbing training program.


Video Improper use of VHF leads to collision - Human errors contributing most to nav accidents today

published on 11 July 2020

Maritime Training Videos series by Dhhunki Productions. Contact us for production of Maritime training & safety videos,Training Shoots & Films,Incident Analysis,Case Study Videos Corporate & Ad Films,Intro-Seminar-Conference Shoots,Documentary & Short films,Music Videos


Article Guide to Helicopter/Ship Operations

published on 13 July 2021

The ICS Guide to Helicopter/Ship Operations is the industry standard best practice guide for shipping companies, ships’ crew and helicopter operators.


Video Very descriptive: Piston Effect when entering lock.

published on 10 May 2020

Two new locks were introduced in 2009 for training in the new Panama lock conditions with or without tug(s). This video shows the famous "piston effect" when entering the lock at an impressive speed of 10 knots with a high blockage factor.
Port Revel provides shiphandling training using manned models for maritime pilots, masters and officers:


Opinion Pilot transfer arrangements - Sharing knowledge matters – but problems go beyond non-compliance to SOLAS itself

by Kevin Vallance deep sea pilot and author - published on 23 September 2020

Like many seafarers I have long been a keen follower of The Nautical Institute’s MARS programme, and along with many other members I listened to the recent webinar on that topic. One theme which was repeated more than once was that it is better to learn from someone else’s misfortune rather than have it happen to you. Having personally been involved in two near misses resulting from unsafe pilot transfer arrangements in a relatively short space of time, I asked how experiences and knowledge specifically about pilot ladder safety could best be promulgated to avoid repeating common accidents or near misses.