Article

Update: "Strength of Pilot Ladders and Intermediate Securing of Pilot Ladders"


by Capt. Troy Evans - published on 2 November 2020 1792

An investigation into actual strength of ladders and intermediate securing methods used

Introduction / Preamble:

I decided to look into pilot ladder strength and intermediate securing arrangements after MNZ put out what I felt was a confusing and unclear document about securing of pilot ladders.

Update from 30.11.2020:
"I have reissued my report due to hearing that some are justifying their use of deck tongues with the results.
The report did not cover regular use and damage caused.
In my opinion, deck tongues are not a good method due to how the load is placed onto just the two crimps, whereas with lashing, the correct shackles for the ladder type or soft round endless slings all place load on the sideropes and 4 crimps.
The reason the deck tongue got a reasonable failure load is to do with inline transfer of load. Recent testing has shown distortion of ladders due to deck tongue securing at relatively low loads. Loose steps and lost wedges / widgets result. Would be interesting to see how often ships replace ladders and how they were secured."



Looking for information about why lashings were preferred got me nowhere; all sources just said they were best.
The discussions went along the line of the following:

Me – “So a piece of rope is not going to damage another piece of rope, but shackles are?”
Expert – “No the shackles put load on the step fixtures, lashings do not”
Me – “But the rope lashings do put load onto the step fixtures”
Expert - “No they do not”
Me – “look at these images”
Expert –“…….”
As you can see in the images the lashings are on the step fixtures.
So Rolling hitch lashings versus …. Choking shackles and other methods, and along with that the strength of ladders – are they as strong as some people think?

Some say traditional seamanship skills are disappearing / gone,
Or is it crew have found a “quicker” way of doing the job with other gear?

How to test?
Load / destruction test.
Where / how can I do that? In the Barn, certified load cell + hydraulic pulling ram system + testbed structure + assorted shackles + time + rope + ladders…. As another pilot says “Easy peasy”

Onto investigating intermediate securing methods and strengths of ladders.


Testing Intermediate Securing of Pilot Ladders:

Methods investigated included the rolling hitch lashing, choking shackles, shackles between sideropes, endless slings, and “deck tongues”

To determine the actual strength of ladders top end securing was tested as well.

The investigation into methods started with assessing the traditional method – rope lashings using rolling hitches.

Rope Lashings

Average breaking strength of Manila rope used for lashings = 2516kg (24.67kN), samples were taken at random from the different parcels received from the supplier. Eyes were spliced in each end then tested to destruction.

Rolling hitch and other assorted knots
First step was to determine if lashings, in particular the rolling hitch, place any load on the crimps / step fixtures.

To determine if lashings would put load onto the fixtures a number of knots where tested on a mock siderope;

  • The knots were tied and firmed up manually with block and tackle,
  • Then a single 200mm pull using a hydraulic pulling ram was applied,
  • The peak reading was taken to determine the best performing knot.
All the knots shifted more than 150mm with the manual load placed on them - this mean the knots would have slid onto the step fixtures.
All the knots shifted more than 150mm with the manual load placed on them - this mean the knots would have slid onto the step fixtures.
All the knots shifted more than 150mm with the manual load placed on them - this mean the knots would have slid onto the step fixtures.
All the knots shifted more than 150mm with the manual load placed on them - this mean the knots would have slid onto the step fixtures.
To make it clear - If the knots were tied onto a pilot ladder rather than a mock side rope with no step fixtures every single knot would have come up on the fixtures with less than 200kg load, nearly all with less than 100kg. In all tests using knots on actual ladders this was found to be true..

As a pilot climbs a ladder the load on either side of the ladder will alternate depending upon the climbing technique, so 100kg of force a side is not hard to achieve when including the ladder weight.

Chaff damage - Chaff on the mock side ropes ranged from minor to moderate or worse.


Testing On Ladders:

Testing On Ladders:

4 different makes of ladder were tested, 2new, 2 old

As it only takes the failure of one side of a ladder for a pilot to fall the majority of tests were carried out on one side only.

The following may affect the results:
  • Less distortion occurs when one side gets loaded than both (results possibly higher)
  • Testing was inline versus uneven setups onboard ship ( results possibly higher)
  • Unless clearly stated, all rope lashings tied onto actual ladder side ropes have an eye spliced in one end and are used for one test only (results possibly higher). Many lashings ropes used onboard use a knot to secure to a strong point
  • Testing has no deck edge feature (results possibly lower)

Side rope strength testing:

Side rope with no fittings
Thimbles were used to allow for a better D/d1.

Single part of line
Single part of line
Single part of line
Single part of line
Single part of line
Old crimped avg result = 741kg
Old Seized avg result = 1970kg
New crimped avg result = 2002kg Removing crimps possible damage to the rope.

Doubled part of line
Doubled part of line
Doubled part of line
Doubled part of line
Doubled part of line
Old Seized avg result = 3592
New crimped avg result = 3269kg Removing crimps possible damage to the rope.

Sideropes with steps crimp / seizings and chocks/widgets
- a section of ladder was modified to have two tops so that the side ropes would be loadedand no load placed on any steps, chocks or crimps except by the sideropes

One side of a ladder loaded
One side of a ladder loaded
One side of a ladder loaded
One side of a ladder loaded
One side of a ladder loaded
Old Seized avg result = 2012kg
New crimped avg result = 2755kg

Both sides were loaded
Both sides were loaded
Both sides were loaded
Both sides were loaded
Both sides were loaded
- Failure of the ladder was deemed to have occurred when one side of a ladder failed
- 3 makes of ladder were tested

Results:
Old Seized = 3020
New crimped =4110

Ratios:
Step testing - wood only:
Strength of timber steps.

Longitudinal pull -
Remove side ropes from step.
Test 1 - Fit shackles to side rope holes - one shackle at each end
Test 1 - Fit shackles to side rope holes - one shackle at each end
Test 1 - Fit shackles to side rope holes - one shackle at each end
Test 1 - Fit shackles to side rope holes - one shackle at each end
Test 2 - Fit shackles to side rope holes - Two shackles at each end
Test 2 - Fit shackles to side rope holes - Two shackles at each end
Test 2 - Fit shackles to side rope holes - Two shackles at each end
Test 2 - Fit shackles to side rope holes - Two shackles at each end
Result Test 1:
Failure occurred at 2600kg

ResultTest 2:
Stopped test at 4800kg, after removing shackles noted that the holes had elongation of approx 1mm in all four side rope holes
Step strength – transverse - loading on tread
Remove side ropes from 2 steps - upper step is there as a spreader.
Fit synthetic line in place of sideropes.
Test 1 - Sling in centre of step - no spreading of load
Test 1 - Sling in centre of step - no spreading of load
Test 1 - Sling in centre of step - no spreading of load
Test 1 - Sling in centre of step - no spreading of load
Test 2 - Sling in centre of step - timber fitted cross grain to avoid crush damage
Test 2 - Sling in centre of step - timber fitted cross grain to avoid crush damage
Test 2 - Sling in centre of step - timber fitted cross grain to avoid crush damage
Test 2 - Sling in centre of step - timber fitted cross grain to avoid crush damage
Test 3 - Block fitted to place load closer to side rope holes
Test 3 - Block fitted to place load closer to side rope holes
Test 3 - Block fitted to place load closer to side rope holes
Test 3 - Block fitted to place load closer to side rope holes
Result Test 1:
Failure occurred at 1730kg

Result Test 2:
Failure occurred at 1760kg

Result Test 3:
Failure occurred at 2910kg

Test 1 shows the likely strength of a wooden step if a pilot boat were to come down on one.
Test 3 shows the timber step strength when the step is used to secure the ladder - see results for deck tongue as these results cannot be used to justify a deck tongue setup due to the test not including conventional side ropes.


Strength of Pilot ladders

I hear people talk about strength of pilot ladders, they refer to the rules which state 24kN for the side rope material, the rules do not state the strength for pilot ladders it is the strength of the material for the side ropes.
You may think this means little, but…. A pilot ladder is proof tested to 8.8kN, which means that the load you should safely put on a pilot ladder in use will be less than 8.8kN.
From the testing carried out we can see that the actual strength of pilot ladders is not 48kN and nowhere near 96kN. Testing so far as an average of 40.3kN

SWL / WLL
Looking at safety factors and proof testing to determine a SWL for a pilot ladder with manila sideropes:
Manila rope SF of 12,
48kN = 4kN,
96kn = 8kN

What proof load is required, looking back I found pilot hoists had to have an overload test of 2.2, below is some of the text from the old MNZ Part 53. Dutch rules are similar.
So applying the 2.2 to what Pilot ladders are currently tested to.
Test load / proof load factor = 8.8kN/2.2 = 4kN = 407kg force
Perhaps this is the SWL / WLL of a pilot ladder.

Being practical is a 407kg SWL / WWL acceptable for a pilot ladder:
What weight does a pilot ladder have to carry?
- itself…. (a 15m long pilot ladder weighs in at 100kg.)
- a pilot 150kg to allow for wallet (with pilots licence in), radio, small bag, wet weather gear (may be fitted with pockets to carry PPU), PPE (Incl Covid-19 gear).

250kg/407kg = 61% of the SWL adequate?

But the ladder strength is 24kN x 4….


Intermediate Securing Methods

Methods tested:

Deck tongue
Deck tongue
Deck tongue
Deck tongue
Deck tongue
Rolling Hitch lashing
Rolling Hitch lashing
Rolling Hitch lashing
Rolling Hitch lashing
Rolling Hitch lashing
Shackles between siderope parts
Shackles between siderope parts
Shackles between siderope parts
Shackles between siderope parts
Shackles between siderope parts
Choking shackles – D shackles
Choking shackles – D shackles
- 20mm pin diameter – more common size
- 15mm pin diameter
Choking shackles – D shackles
- 20mm pin diameter – more common size
- 15mm pin diameter
Choking shackles – D shackles
- 20mm pin diameter – more common size
- 15mm pin diameter
Choking shackles – D shackles
- 20mm pin diameter – more common size
- 15mm pin diameter
Endless soft sling
Endless soft sling
Endless soft sling
Endless soft sling
Endless soft sling
Deck Tongue
Tests were conducted inline without a deck edge turn
- Old crimped: 815kg
- Old Seized: 2669kg, note between 300 - 1000kg seizings slid
- New crimped – 1 - New: 2316 crimps slid at ~900kg, load increased until failure
- New crimped - 2 – New: 1506* crimps slid at ~1000kg, load increased, ladder badly distorted


THE FOLLOWING TESTS WERE CONDUCTED ON ONE SIDE OF A LADDER

Rolling hitch lashing:
- Old Crimped ladder -857kg
- Old Seized – 1280kg
- New crimped - 1s – 1043kg
- New crimped - 2n – 1145kg
Shackle between the side ropes:
- Old Crimped ladder - 898kg – crimps kept sliding
- Old Seized – 1469kg
- New crimped - 1s – 1091kg
- New crimped - 2n – 1422kg
Choking Shackles:
Choking Shackle 20mm pin dia D shackle:
- Old Crimped ladder -692kg – crimps kept sliding
- Old Seized – 1857kg
- New crimped - 1s – 1492kg
- New crimped - 2n – 1421kg
Choking Shackle 15mm pin dia D shackle:
- Old Crimped ladder -1000kg
- Old Seized – 1822kg
- New crimped - 1s – 1480kg
- New crimped - 2n – 1522kg
Choking Shackle – all types tested:
- Old Crimped ladder -888kg
- Old Seized – 1827kg
- New crimped - 1s – 1481kg
- New crimped - 2n – 1472kg
Endless Soft Round Sling 2T WLL and Shackle 6.5T WLL:
- Old Crimped ladder - 1025kg
- Old Seized – 2184kg
- New crimped - 1s – 2094kg
- New crimped - 2n – 1925kg


Summary, Comments & Observations

Results so far…
The following graph uses a factor of 1.49 to convert one side results (light blue), into a calculated failure load for both sides (Purple), it also shows the avg for tests conducted with both sides at the same time (Grey).
The 1.49 comes from the ratios found with testing.

Note 1: have added calculated failure one side for deck tongue and double ended.
Note 2: In the case of the deck tongue tests the ladders would have been damaged beyond repair well before side rope failure occurred.
Note 1: have added calculated failure one side for deck tongue and double ended.
Note 2: In the case of the deck tongue tests the ladders would have been damaged beyond repair well before side rope failure occurred.
Note 1: have added calculated failure one side for deck tongue and double ended.
Note 2: In the case of the deck tongue tests the ladders would have been damaged beyond repair well before side rope failure occurred.
Note 1: have added calculated failure one side for deck tongue and double ended.
Note 2: In the case of the deck tongue tests the ladders would have been damaged beyond repair well before side rope failure occurred.
Sometimes the lashings using rolling hitches failed before the ladder did. All the other methods the
side ropes failed before the securing gear did.
The lashing either cut itself or it caused the side ropes to fail.

Strongest method?
Currently the strongest intermediate securing arrangement available that I have tested is to use soft round endless slings cow-hitched to the sideropes and shackled to strong points using tested shackles. See last page for photos.
2T WLL slings(14T MBL) with 6.5T WLL (MBL over 30T) green pin shackles were used in testing. The strength of these exceeds the strength requirements under the rules.
Strength of ladders
Average strength of ladders tested – 4110kg / 40.3kN
Would having a SWL make a difference?
Perhaps - it might mean that after a pilot boat snags a ladder it would have to be thoroughly inspected or tested?
Or maybe if ladders had a SWL of 407kg ship’s crew might take better care, pilot transfer vessels might just might get designed and driven with that in mind, after all a ladder is tested to 8.8kN, whatinsurance company would pay out on an equipment failure that occurs at a load beyond that whichthe equipment has been tested to?
Another possible intermediate securing method
There is presently a device under development, initial tests show that it is as strong as using slings, but it has the added benefit that it leaves a mark on the side ropes to show that over half a tonne has been applied to the side of the ladder it is securing – in other words if the side ropes have both got the marks then the ladder has been subjected to more than it has been tested to (8.8kN).

Last say - Revised

With limited resources and limited testing carried out, less than 300tests on 4 different makes of ladders, further testing may show differences. Very early testing showed choking shackles and lashings to be similar in strength, yet with further testing this has been found to be false.
Different shackles with different ladders brought different results – check with the ladder manufacturer.

Deck tongues – The use of deck tongues – note that the test results show seizings / crimps started to shift at loads as low as 300kg for older ladders and at around 1000kg for new. It appears deck tongues are practically guaranteed to shorten ladder life.

Fatigue testing should be carried out – I currently do not have the time or resources to do this though I do intend to continue testing methods that are currently in use and investigate alternatives, any assistance is appreciated.

Gear used for the intermediate securing of pilot ladders should be tested and certified.

Random knots tied with random offcuts of line - you would not secure cargo with them.


Soft Endless Sling Method

Slings cow-hitched to sideropes:
Sling cow-hitched to siderope with turns taken around shackle to shorten the sling:

Join the conversation...

Login or register to write comments and join the discussion!
SP
Sanjeev Pande Ocean Sparkle Limited, India
on 19 December 2020, 06:11 UTC

Troy, this upends what has been asserted by several other pilots. That securing a ladder at intermediate length can safely be done only using a rope lashing applied to the side ropes using a rolling hitch. From the several methods of securing tested by you, the "deck tongue" emerges as the least strong. And the endless soft sling the most strong.
What then of the advice being put forth by CHIRP and several P&I associations that have accepted "the rolling hitch lashing: as the only correct way to secure (for intermediate length ladders)?
0

JV
Jorge Viso American Pilots Association, USA
on 10 December 2020, 21:07 UTC

Troy, this is important work you have initiated. Thank you.
0

Read more...

Article Pilot ladders - bits and pieces and a bit of testing

by Capt. Troy Evans - published on 14 October 2020

The following article appeared in AIMPA magazine number 2 about the strength and testing of pilot ladders : There is much more information about pilot ladders in the AIMPA magazine, second issue, if you wish to read more you can download a copy at the bottom of this post.

1

Article Pilot Transfer Arrangements

by Captain Kevin Vallance MNI - published on 2 October 2019

Most pilot embarkations and disembarkations around the world, are still carried out using a traditional pilot ladder, consisting of wooden steps supported and secured by side ropes.

0

Article A contempt for pilot safety and total disregard for the contents of the SOLAS Convention.

by Captain Kevin Vallance MNI - published on 4 October 2019

Tuesday, October 1st is the start date of the latest International Maritime Pilot Association's annual Safety Campaign.

Previous campaigns by the association have consistently shown results of pilot ladder deficiencies around the 20% mark.

0

Article Demands made by the Pacific Pilotage Authority on the shipping industry following the death of US Pilot Dennis Sherwood

by Marine-Pilots.com - published on 27 March 2020

The Pacific Pilotage Authority says: "There is a common misunderstanding amongst vessel operators that vessels built prior to 2012 are exempt from some of the requirements for pilot transfer arrangements. This is incorrect...".

0

Video Marine Pilot Transfer by Helicopter

The transfer of Marine Ship’s Pilots by helicopter hoist is a demanding task. These 24/7, severe weather missions require detailed training in all phases of the operations and focus on the “team’s” capabilities is essential in all phases of the operations and focus on the “team’s” capabilities is essential.

0

Video How the Pilot Disembark using by Helicopter

#Pilotonboard #Durbanpilot #DangerousjobatSea #Seaman #Marino #Seafarers

0

Opinion A year ago, pilot Capt. Dennis Sherwood died in the line of duty

by Frank Diegel - published on 30 December 2020

It has been exactly one year ago that a pilot from Sandy Hook (New York), Dennis Sherwood, died in the line of duty while attempting to board the container vessel Maersk Kensington.
What has happened since then? Has safety been improved for the pilots?

1

Article Securing pilot ladders at intermediate lengths

by Kevin Vallance deep sea pilot and author - published on 6 January 2020

Over the past few years a number of pilot transfer accidents have occurred resulting from total failure of the side ropes, one school of thought is that the methods of securing a pilot ladder is a factor in such occurrences.

0

Video A Pilot Underway To Work

It’s not always calm seas, helicopters and fast speedboats. In the third weekend storm this year, the pilot embarks MV VERA D by fast launch craft of the Pilot Station Vessel PROCYON. It takes professional teamwork by Pilotboat crew, the ship VERA D and VTS to board these ships in the harshest conditions in a violent Northsea. Well done and thanks to all players involved!

0

Video Detailed Track: Collision of "Carnival Legend" and "Glory" on Dec 20 2019, Mexico

Two Carnival cruise ships collided in Cozumel, Mexico on December 20th 2019, causing damage to both ships.

0