Article

Snakes or Ladders


by Ewan Rattray, UK - published on 12 March 2021 134

A MIXED METHODOLOGY REVIEW INTO THE BOARDING AND LANDING OF MARITIME PILOTS

Foreword by Ewan Rattray

Although the boarding and landing of pilots is regulated, there are a high volume of non-compliant transfer arrangements throughout the industry. With that in mind, I have conducted much needed industry research into the issues surrounding non-compliance - Please see attached research paper.

I would like to thank my colleagues Kevin Vallance, Arie Palmers and John Pearn.

The paper has been peer reviewed by Captain Don Cockrill MBE CMMar FNI & Captain David Willows B.Comm MM AFNI who gave the following comments:

"The paper deserves wide acceptance by the maritime community and I have no hesitation in recommending such."

"The research and findings in the paper have codified and substantiated many of the concerns raised by pilots and pilot organisations worldwide. It should be considered by government, industry and pilots as an opportunity for positive discussions that will help inform and improve the safety of pilot boarding. The need for action is acute and immediate."

The paper is open access so please do use and share provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer

The results and conclusions in this article are based upon the review of relevant literature, research and data analysis and have not been influenced by the professional views, opinions or experiences of the author.

Abstract

Although the boarding and landing of pilots is regulated, there are a high volume of non-compliant transfer arrangements throughout the industry. An industry which highlights and is conscious of risk and promotes the importance of a proactive safety culture. In light of this, it is the aim of this research to critically investigate and understand what is contributing to such a high level of non-compliance.

The first step was a literature review which highlighted several key areas where associated areas of the framework may be falling down. The problem was, owing to a lack of current research the failings in the literature review could not be directly linked to the boarding and landing of pilots. To this end, a mixed methodology review was adopted in order to further investigate and document the areas affecting compliance.

The research produced a number of key findings. Namely a failure in regulation, regulatory enforcement, training and vessel design. All underlined in an industry which did not promote, encourage or learn from accidents and incidents. This resulted in an industry which erroneously and dangerously left pilots to become the last line of defence in a system which did not work. Although the research identified several key failings, the main conclusion that was drawn was that there are several key measures which can be adopted which would greatly improve the safe boarding and landing of pilots.

1.0 Introduction

The Laws of Oleron were introduced into English Law in the 12th century. Their purpose was to govern maritime trade in the West, through a body of rules and standards for all stakeholders. (Wood 1914). An example of one such rule was Article XXII, which stated that if a pilot had the conduct of a vessel and failed in his duty, he was to make full satisfaction to the vessel’s master or risked losing his head. Thankfully, in modern society, it is no longer commonplace to cut off a pilot’s head. As described by Boraiko, Beardsley & Wright (2008), we now live in a world where we are conscious of risk and accidents and incidents are investigated with a view to prevent reoccurrence and to increase the overall safety culture.

So, what changed in 800 years?
The answer is twofold. As explained by Friedman et al. (1967) the way to enforce changes to societal beliefs is by altering both custom and law. Essentially, society grew to believe that an injury or death in the workplace was unacceptable, and the law changed to put accountability onto the employer. Coupled with the growing realisation that industrial injuries and claims are better avoided through system and design changes, rather than blame and a fear of reprisal (Dekker 2014, p.6-7). These changing views, alongside new legislation forced our industries to implement change. So much so, that we now live in a society where a business or industry, which invests time and money in building a strong relationship with safety systems, safety climate and building a safety culture, will actually be rewarded in terms of competitive advantage, reliability and profitability - a concept which is commonplace today (Cooper 1998, p.32). A concept which has also been adopted by the maritime industry. The International Maritime Organisation (IMO), operate with the mission to promote and adopt the highest standards of safety through international cooperation (IMO 2019). Taking all of this into account, it would be safe to assume that society could no longer imagine a pilot losing their head at the hand of the master..
Has the change worked for Maritime Pilots?
Although not losing their heads, unfortunately, pilots are still being injured during the course of their duties, specifically whilst boarding and landing vessels. According to the UKMPA (2020), in the last four years, six maritime pilots have lost their lives boarding and landing vessels, and The American Club (n.d), predict that pilot fatality is as high as 2-3 per year. Worryingly, of the five reported deaths, only two accident and investigation reports are publicly available; all somewhat contradictory to the safety culture we discussed above.

If we take Europe as an example, a low estimation of pilotage numbers would be at least one million acts of pilotage a year across Europe (European Commission Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport 2012). When we consider these numbers concerning pilot fatalities, it could be argued that boarding and landing is statistically safe. The problem being, there are no definitive near-miss or accident statistics surrounding boarding and landing to compare these numbers against.
However, what we can compare is that surrounding each pilot’s death the transfer arrangement was is some way non-compliant. For example, the MAIB concluded in their Sunmi and Patrol report regarding the fatal accidents of a pilot, that although there were contributing factors, the transfer arrangement was non-compliant (MAIB 2017). Essentially, if the vessel SUMNI had provided safe and convenient transfer arrangements, as is required in law, the accident would not have happened. Another unfortunate example is the incident involving the Maersk Kensington. The pilot tragically fell whilst trying to manoeuvre past a non-compliant trapdoor arrangement (Nautilus International 2020).

When we consider the fact that pilots are dying at the hands of non-compliant Pilot Transfer Arrangements (PTA), even if it is argued that boarding and landing is statistically safe, there is simply no argument that a non-compliant PTA is either safe or acceptable. In a recent survey conducted by the International Maritime Pilots Association, non-compliant transfer arrangements ranged from 6.77% to 58.06% depending on geographical location. A notable example was Europe who reported 20.49% of vessels trading in the area had non-compliant transfer arrangements.

All things considered, society and our industry have accepted that a pilot should not lose their head when something goes wrong. furthermore, we recognise the benefits learning from accidents and incidents brings. Despite this, it would appear the same courtesy is not being offered to pilots when they board or land a vessel. Much like a game of snakes and ladders, pilots are having to rely upon a role of the dice and take a gamble; will we get a snake, or will we get a ladder? To this end, the question is why?

. . .
Read the complete article as PDF (884 KB)
Editor's note:
Opinion pieces reflect the personal opinion of individual authors. They do not allow any conclusions to be drawn about a prevailing opinion in the respective editorial department. Opinion pieces might be deliberately formulated in a pronounced or even explicit tone and may contain biased arguments. They might be intended to polarise and stimulate discussion. In this, they deliberately differ from the factual articles you typically find on this platform, written to present facts and opinions in as balanced a manner as possible.
What's your opinion on this?
Login or register to write comments and join the discussion!
Read more...

Video Safety of Navigation vs. Commercial Pressure

Safety of Navigation vs. Commercial Pressure / ROMEILs Tv Commercial Pressures impacts the safety of the vessel, study says Seafarers are pressured to keep quiet and keep the ship moving by ship operators, who dont want to lose inccome. Ship's officers who bring safety issues to the attention of management are exposed to the risk of retaliation. As whistle-blowers they may face punishment, demotion or even termination. International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots (MM&P) has...

0

Video Venice pilot boat alongside "Rhapsody of the Seas" sailing from Venice Italy

Venice pilot boat escorting "Rhapsody of the Seas" from Venice cruise terminal #venice#cruiseship#shipsboats

0

Article Pilot Boarding and Landing – use of Personal Emergency Radio Devices

by Nick Lee, T&TC Chairman, UK Pilots - published on 4 February 2020

Personal Locator Beacons (PLB) and other individual MOB devices have been available for some years now and have evolved to incorporate a variety of different alerting methods and combinations. However, usage of these additional enhancements within UK Pilotage is still in its infancy.

0

Video Berthing of MV ASL LEBAN, 178 m × 29 m

Created by VideoShow:http://videoshowapp.com/free

0

Opinion Maritime Pilotage - Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow

by André Gaillard - published on 17 February 2021

In this article Marine Pilot André Gaillard gives us his vision of the maritime pilotage profession of yesterday, today and tomorrow.

2

Video Good old times: PLA Thames Pilots at Work

Footage showing the ARCADIA leaving Tilbury Landing Stage and PLA pilot boarding sugar ship bound for Thames Refinery. footage taken from the documentary short film ' Till I End My Song'

0

Video History: Trinity House Buoys (1966)

Harwich, Essex. Several shots of buoys at a warehouse on the quay. Various shots show the Trinity House Vessel 'Siren' setting out to sea to carry out maintenance on buoys; a naval flag showing the Union Jack and the Trinity House Jack is hoisted; officers are seen using sextants and plotting their course on a chart. Nice M/S of a sailor tying on a life jacket. Sailors drop anchor beside a buoy, hoist weather balloons and ring bells on the ship. The buoy is cleaned of mussels and limpets...

0

Opinion Book review: Practical Ship Handling, Fourth Edition, by Malcolm C. Armstrong

by Kevin Vallance deep sea pilot and author - published on 5 June 2020

Some ship handlers today use electronic instruments from start to finish and these ships usually have powerful engines and thrusters and an almost unlimited number of personnel on the bridge.

0

Article Los Angeles Pilot Service Commissions Two New Pilot Boats

published on 15 October 2020

The Los Angeles Pilot Service ordered two customized 56′ Camarc Design pilot boats (P/B) built by Vigor Industrial at their Vancouver, WA facility, located on the northern side of the Columbia River. The LA Pilot Service took delivery of the P/B Angels Pilot and Angels Navigator at Vigor’s shipyard on Swan Island in Portland, Oregon in early October.

0

Article Marking, Certification of Pilot Ladders

by Herman Broers - published on 5 January 2021

The name tag plate on this ladder displays a few important items that can be cross referenced with the certificate: Type, Model, Length, Production date, as well as the serial number (Prod.No) and the approval standard.

1